Alliance against road building

 

PRESS RELEASE – 18th October 2005


GOVERNMENT GIVES ROADS GO AHEADS DESPITE COST ESCALATION

Today the government gave the go-ahead to three local authority road schemes, all of which have increased in cost [1]. One of the schemes, the Papworth Everard Bypass in Cambridgeshire, has almost doubled in cost.

Research by CPRE (Campaign to Protect Rural England) has shown that almost the entire roads programme is experiencing significant cost escalation [2].

Cost escalation is frequently given as a reason to pull the plug on funding for public transport schemes, including tram schemes at Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds and Portsmouth.

In a government report published last year [3], it concluded that investing in 'smarter choices' and 'soft measures' to persuade people to use alternatives to the car is usually more cost effective that building roads.

Rebecca Lush of Road Block said:
"It is time that the government stopped wasting valuable funds of futile road building, and instead invested in sustainable alternatives. Alternatives to catering for traffic growth are cheaper, greener, and will give longer lasting benefits. More road building leads to more traffic, and we all suffer as a result. Roads represent bad value for money, and a bad deal for the environment. The government is acting hypocritically by allowing expensive roads to go ahead, yet cancelling public transport schemes when the costs rise too."

Notes to Editors:

[1]The three schemes given the go-ahead are:

[2] CPRE (Campaign to Protect Rural England) discovered in July 2005 that almost the entire roads programme is experiencing significant cost escalation.
See http://www.cpre.org.uk/news-releases/news-rel-2005/47-05.htm . The costs were revealed in a Parliamentary Question.

[3] Making Smarter Choices Work, DfT, July 2004
http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_susttravel/documents/page/dft_susttravel_038456.pdf